Impact of quaternary prevention as a brief intervention in medical students’ clinical decisions: experience from Vietnam

Thi Hoa Vi Tran, Thanh Liem Vo


Objective: to evaluate undergraduate medical students’ clinical decision-making process after a brief intervention lecture on quaternary prevention (P4). Methods: quantitative self-controlled intervention study carried out with fifth-year medical students of Pham Ngoc Thach University, Hochiminh city, Vietnam. The medical students were asked to list their eventual interventions based on three different simulated clinical scenarios. The survey was conducted before and after the intervention. Student’s propositions were classified into one of the four groups of prevention, according to Jamoulle’s model. Results: 115 students participated, resulting in 211 answered sheets. The interventions proposed by the students were mostly centered on prevention groups 1, 2 and 3; the three clinical scenarios partially explained student’s intentions of counseling, screening and palliative care. Comparing the data of second phase survey, the intervention was associated with changes in students’ aptitude on clinical decision-making, which was especially more important for prevention group 1 (OR=7.5) and prevention group 4 (OR=30.05). There was no statistically significant difference in changing students’ decision for prevention group 2 (OR=0.95 p=0.466) and prevention group 3 (OR=2.29 p=0.932). Conclusion: introducing quaternary prevention to the undergraduate medical course can help to steer clinical decisions toward primary prevention and to avoid inappropriate medical interventions.


Quaternary Prevention; Decision Making; Education, Medical; Vietnam; Family Medicine.

Texto completo:

PDF/A (English)


Greenhalgh T, Howick J, Maskrey N, Evidence Based Medicine Renaissance Group. Evidence based medicine: a movement in crisis? BMJ. 2014;348:g3725. PMid:24927763.

Gérvas J, Starfield B, Violán C, Minué S. GPs with special interests: unanswered questions. Br J Gen Pract. 2007;57(544):912-917. PMid:17976293.

Higgs J, Jones MA. Clinical decision making and multiple problem spaces. In: Higgs J, Jones MA, Loftus S, Christense N, editors. Clinical reasoning in the health professions. 3rd ed. Boston: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2008. p.3-17.

Payton OD, Nelson CE, Ozer MN. Patient participation in program planning: a manual for therapist. Philadelphia: Davis; 1990.

Jamoulle M. Information et informatisation en médecine générale. Les informa-g-iciens. 1986:193-209.

Bentzen N. WONCA Dictionary of general/family practice. Copenhagen: Laegeforeningens Forlag; 2003.

Porta M. A Dictionary of epidemiology. 6th ed. Oxford University Press; 2014.

Jamoulle M, Roland M. Quaternary prevention-From Wonca world Hong Kong 1995 to Wonca world Prague 2013. Prague: Wonca World Prague; 2013.

McWhinney IR. A textbook of family medicine. New York: Oxford University Press; 1989.

Vo LT. Développement de la médecine de famille au Vietnam. Liège: Université de Liège; 2013.

Ntzoufras I. Bayesian modeling using WinBUGS. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons; 2009.

Rijmen F, Tuerlinckx F, Meulders M, Smits DJ, Balázs K. Mixed model estimation methods for the Rasch model. J Appl Meas. 2005;6(3):273-88. PMID: 15942071.

Lunn DJ, Thomas A, Best N, Spiegelhalter D. WinBUGS: a Bayesian modelling framework. Concepts, structure, and extensibility. Stat Comput. 2000;10(4):325-337.

Jamoulle M. Quaternary prevention, an answer of family doctors to overmedicalization. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2015;4(2):61-64.

Pandve HT. Quaternary prevention: need of the hour. J Family Med Prim Care. 2014;3(4):309-310.

WONCA EUROPE. The European definition of general practice/Family medicine. London; 2011 [cited 2013 Sept 4] Available from:

World Health Organization. Primary health care: now more than ever. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2008.



  • Não há apontamentos.

Direitos autorais 2015 Revista Brasileira de Medicina de Família e Comunidade


Desenvolvido por:

Logomarca da Lepidus Tecnologia