The challenge of the quality and integrity of scientific publications
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5712/rbmfc12(39)1434Keywords:
Scientific Publication Ethics. Scientific Misconduct. Peer Review.PlagiarismAbstract
The increasing importance of the sciences raises issues related to the validity, veracity, relevance, usefulness, accountability and sustainability of the products of scientific practice. Therefore, practices that compromise the integrity of scientific research are fundamental, both by researchers and by scientific journals. In 2016, the Brazilian Journal of Family and Community Medicine (RBMFC) refused 14 papers that had problems with plagiarism, which represents approximately 10% of the submissions of the year. We consider this a serious problem that requires greater attention and care from authors who intend to contribute to the journal. The editorial policy of RBMFC values the quality of its publications, respecting internationally accepted ethical principles and integrity of scientific research.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Beck U. Sociedade de risco: rumo a uma outra modernidade. São Paulo: Editora 34; 2010.
Greenhalgh T, Howick J, Maskrey N; Evidence Based Medicine Renaissance Group. Evidence based medicine: a movement in crisis? BMJ. 2014;348:g3725. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g3725 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g3725
Brownson RC, Chriqui JF, Stamatakis KA. Understanding evidence-based public health policy. Am J Public Health. 2009;99(9):1576-83. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2008.156224 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2008.156224
Pope C. Resisting evidence: the study of evidence-based medicine as a contemporary social movement. Health. 2003;7(3):267-82. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1363459303007003002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1363459303007003002
Hames IM. Research integrity in an increasingly competitive and complex world. Beilstein Magazine. 2016;2(7). [citado 17 Jan 2017]. Disponível em: http://www.beilstein-institut.de/en/publications/magazine/scientific-essays/hames. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3762/bmag.7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3762/bmag.7
Ware M, Mabe M. The STM Report. An overview of scientific and scholarly journal publishing. Hague: International Association of Scientific, Technical and Medical Publishers; 2015. [citado 17 Jan 2017]. Disponível em: http://www.stm-assoc.org/2015_02_20_STM_Report_2015.pdf.
Fanelli D. How many scientists fabricate and falsify research? A systematic review and meta-analysis of survey data. PLoS One. 2009;4(5):e5738. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0005738 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0005738
Ioannidis JP. Why most published research findings are false. PLoS Med. 2005;2(8):e124. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124
Ioannidis JP. The Mass Production of Redundant, Misleading, and Conflicted Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. Milbank Q. 2016;94(3):485-514. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1468-0009.12210 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0009.12210
European Science Foundation (ESF), All European Academies (ALLEA). The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity. Strasbourg: ESF/ALLEA; 2011. P. 1-20. ISBN: 978-2-918428-37-4. [citado 17 Jan 2017]. Disponível em: http://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/data/ref/h2020/other/hi/h2020-ethics_code-of-conduct_en.pdf
Moylan EC, Kowalczuk MK. Why articles are retracted: a retrospective cross-sectional study of retraction notices at BioMed Central. BMJ Open. 2016;6(11):e012047. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012047 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012047
van Noorden R. Science publishing: The trouble with retractions. Nature. 2011;478(7367):26-8. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/478026a DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/478026a
Dansinger M. Dear Plagiarist: A Letter to a Peer Reviewer Who Stole and Published Our Manuscript as His Own. Ann Intern Med. 2017;166(2):143. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7326/M16-2551 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7326/M16-2551
Finelli C, Crispino P, Gioia S, La Sala N, D’amico L, La Grotta M, et al. Retraction: The improvement of large High-Density Lipoprotein (HDL) particle levels, and presumably HDL metabolism, depend on effects of low-carbohydrate diet and weight loss. EXCLI J. 2016;15:570.
Laine C. Scientific Misconduct Hurts. Ann Intern Med. 2017;166(2):148-9. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7326/M16-2550 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7326/M16-2550
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
By submitting a manuscript to the RBMFC, authors retain ownership of the copyright in the article, and authorize RBMFC to publish that manuscript under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 license and identify itself as the vehicle of its original publication.
