Prevalence of high utilizers of health services with positive history for depression in Primary Health Care
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5712/rbmfc10(34)957Keywords:
Depression, Health Services Accessibility, Primary Health CareAbstract
Objective: to study the association between history of depression and high use of health services (HUHS) among persons seen in Primary Health Care (PHC), and to establish the prevalence of HUHS, the average number of visits and the epidemiological profile of groups with positive and negative history of depression. Methods: we collected data from family medical records of two Health Units. In order to analyze data regarding the primary outcome and to compare the epidemiological profile of the groups, we used the chi-square test. To compare the difference in mean number of visits between groups, we used the Student’s t-test. Results: we included 278 patients. The prevalence of depression and HUHS in the sample were, respectively, 15.1 and 4.3%. There was a difference in the prevalence of HUHS in the group with positive history of depression, 14.3%, when compared to the group with a negative history of depression, 2.5% (PR = 5.62 , CI 95% 1.90 to 16.59, p = 0.004). The average number of visits in the group with positive history of depression was 5.25 visits / year, while in the group with negative history of depression was 2.59, with a mean difference of 2.65 (CI 95% 1.90 to 3.40; p < 0.001). We also observed higher prevalences of dyspepsia and antidepressant use among HSH. Conclusion: the results support the literature indicating that people with a history of depression tend to make more use of PHC services, with a higher prevalence of HUHS. Thus, a greater knowledge about the profile of the HSH will enable the development of more effective approaches for these users.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Berghöfer A, et al. Efficacy of a systematic depression management program in high utilizers of primary care: a randomized trial. BMC Health Services Research. 2012;12:298. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-12-298 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-12-298
Bromet, et al. Cross-national epidemiology of DSM-IV major depressive episode. BMC Medicine. 2011;9:90. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-9-90 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-9-90
IBGE. Sala de Imprensa: Pesquisa Nacional por Amostra de Domicílios 2008 – Um Panorama da Saúde no Brasil [acesso em 2012 Ago 25]. Disponível em: http://www.ibge.gov.br/home/presidencia/noticias/noticia_visualiza.php?id_noticia=1580&
Maurer DM. Screening for depression. Am Fam Physician. 2012;85(2):139-144.
Gilbody S, Sheldon T, House A. Screening and case-finding instruments for depression: a meta-analysis. CMAJ. 2008;178(8):997-1003. http://dx.doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.070281 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.070281
Molina MRAL,et al. Prevalência de depressão em usuários de unidades de atenção primária. Rev Psiq Clin. 2012;39(6):194-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0101-60832012000600003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0101-60832012000600003
Sharp LK, Lipsky MS. Screening for depression across the lifespan: a review of measures for use in primary care settings. Am Fam Physician. 2002;66:1001-8,1045-6,1048,1051-2.
MacMillan HL, et al. Screening for depression in primary care: recommendation statement from the canadian task force on preventive health care. CMAJ. 2005 Jan 4;172(1):33-5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.1030823 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.1030823
U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for Depression in Adults: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151:784-792. http://dx.doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-151-11-200912010-00006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-151-11-200912010-00006
Mautner DB, et al. Generating hypotheses about care needs of high utilizers: lessons from patient interviews. http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/pop.2013.0033 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/pop.2013.0033
Nunes JM, Yaphe J, Santos I. Sintomas somatoformes em medicina de família: um estudo descritivo da incidência e evolução em uma unidade de saúde familiar de Portugal. Rev Bras Med Fam Comunidade. 2013;8(28):164-71. http://dx.doi.org/10.5712/rbmfc8(28)652 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5712/rbmfc8(28)652
Savageau JA, et al. Characteristics of frequent attenders at a community health center. J Am Board Fam Med. 2006;19:265–75. http://dx.doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.19.3.265 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.19.3.265
Pearson, et al. Depression among hith utilizers of medical care. J Gen Intern Med. 1999;14:461-468. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.1999.06278.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.1999.06278.x
Lefevre, et al. Screening for undetected mental disorders in high mental disorders in high utilizers of primary care. J Gen Intern Med. 1999;14:425–431. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.1999.07238.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.1999.07238.x
Hildebrandt DE, et al. Are frequent callers to family physicians high utilizers? Ann Fam Med. 2004;2:546-548. http://dx.doi.org/10.1370/afm.127 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.127
O´Connor EA, et al. Screening for depression in adult patients in primary care settings: a systematic evidence review. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151:793-803. http://dx.doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-151-11-200912010-00007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-151-11-200912010-00007
Gunn JM, et al. Who is identified when screening for depression is undertaken in general practice? baseline findings from the diagnosis, management and outcomes of depression in primary care (diamond) longitudinal study. MJA. 2008;188:S119–S125. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5694/j.1326-5377.2008.tb01874.x
Simon GE, et al. Cost-effectiveness of sistematic depression treatment for high utillizers of general medical care. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2001;58:181-187. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.58.2.181 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.58.2.181
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
By submitting a manuscript to the RBMFC, authors retain ownership of the copyright in the article, and authorize RBMFC to publish that manuscript under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 license and identify itself as the vehicle of its original publication.