The cervix cancer tracking organization by a Family Health team in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5712/rbmfc13(40)1633Keywords:
Primary Health Care, Family Health Strategy, Mass Screening, Uterine Cervical Neoplasms, Quality ImprovementAbstract
Introduction: Organized cervix cancer tracking remains a challenge to be overcome across Brazil. Objective: To describe the intervention of a Family Health team to improve the quality of the actions to track this condition. Methods: The intervention was structured based on the national recommendations for the tracking of cervix cancer and the available evidence on how to improve popular participation in tracking programs. Functionalities of the electronic medical records were fundamental to the viability of this proposal. From the reorientation of care and administrative practices, an organized cervix cancer tracking program was established and maintained for 15 months in this Family Health team. Results: In the month prior to the beginning of the intervention, the health unit and programmatic area teams had a 10% average coverage of the target population screened. At the end of 15 months, the intervention team reached a 44% coverage, in contrast to the 22% average of the other teams in the unit, and 25% of the programmatic area. Conclusions: When a Family Health team undertakes efforts to organize the tracking of cervix cancer, good results can be achieved in increasing population coverage. We hope that every Family Health team may benefit for this publication and engage in organized cervix cancer tracking, contributing in this way to community’s health improvement.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. Instituto Nacional de Câncer José Alencar Gomes da Silva (INCA). Diretrizes Brasileiras para o Rastreamento do Câncer do Colo do Utero. Coordenação de Prevenção e Vigilância. 2ª ed [Internet]. Rio de Janeiro: INCA; 2016 [acesso 2018 Abr 16]. Disponível em: http://www1.inca.gov.br/inca/Arquivos/DDiretrizes_para_o_Rastreamento_do_cancer_do_colo_do_utero_2016_corrigido.pdf
Derchain S, Teixeira JC, Zeferino LC. Organized, Population-based Cervical Cancer Screening Program: It Would Be a Good Time for Brazil Now. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2016;38(4):161-3. http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0036-1582399 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0036-1582399
Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. Secretaria de Atenção à Saúde. Caderno de Atenção Primária. Rastreamento [Internet]. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde; 2010 [acesso 2018 Abr 16]. Disponível em: http://bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/publicacoes/caderno_atencao_primaria_29_rastreamento.pdf
Sarfati D, Shaw C, Simmonds S. Commentary: Inequalities in cancer screening programmes. Int J Epidemiol. 2010;39(3):766-8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyq039 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyq039
World Health Organization (WHO). Comprehensive cervical cancer control: a guide to essential practice. 2nd ed. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2014 [Internet] [acesso 2018 Abr 16]. Disponível em: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/144785/9789241548953_eng.pdf?sequence=1
Everett T, Bryant A, Griffin MF, Martin-Hirsch PP, Forbes CA, Jepson RG. Interventions targeted at women to encourage the uptake of cervical screening. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;5:CD002834 [acesso 2018 Abr 16]. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD002834.pub2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD002834.pub2
Camilloni L, Ferroni E, Cendales BJ, Pezzarossi A, Furnari G, Borgia P, et al. Methods to increase participation in organized screening programs: a systematic review. BMC Public Health. 2013;13:464 [acesso 2018 Abr 16]. Disponível em: https://bmcpublichealth.biomedcentral.com/track/pdf/10.1186/1471-2458-13-464?site=bmcpublichealth.biomedcentral.com DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-13-464
Vale DB, Westin MC, Zeferino LC. High-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion in women aged <30 years has a prevalence pattern resembling low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion. Cancer Cytopathol. 2013;121(10):576-81 [acesso 2018 Abr 16]. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cncy.21312 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/cncy.21312
Landy R, Birke H, Castanon A, Sasieni P. Benefits and harms of cervical screening from age 20 years compared with screening from age 25 years. Br J Cancer. 2014;110(7):1841-6 [acesso 2018 Abr 16]. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2014.65 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2014.65
Kyrgiou M, Koliopoulos G, Martin-Hirsch P, Arbyn M, Prendiville W, Paraskevaidis E. Obstetric outcomes after conservative treatment for intraepithelial or early invasive cervical lesions: systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. 2006;367(9509):489-98 [acesso 2018 Abr 16]. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68181-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68181-6
Silva AL, Mangin D, Pizzanelli M, Jamoulle M, Wagner HL, Silva DH, et al. Manifesto de Curitiba: pela Prevenção Quaternária e por uma Medicina sem conflitos de interesse. Rev Bras Med Fam Comunidade. 2014;9(33):371-4 [acesso 2018 Abr 16]. http://dx.doi.org/10.5712/rbmfc9(33)1006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5712/rbmfc9(33)1006
Hart JT. The Inverse Care Law. Lancet. 1971;297(7696):405-12 [acesso 2018 Abr 16]. Disponível em: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S014067367192410X DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(71)92410-X
Ogrinc G, Davies L, Goodman D, Batalden P, Davidoff F, Stevens D. SQUIRE 2.0 (Standards for Quality Improvement Reporting Excellence): revised publication guidelines from a detailed consensus process. BMJ Qual Saf. 2016;25(12):986-92 [acesso 2018 Abr 16]. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004411 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004411
Chaudhry B, Wang J, Wu S, Maglione M, Mojica W, Roth E, et al. Systematic Review: Impact of Health Information Technology on Quality, Efficiency, and Costs of Medical Care. Ann Intern Med. 2006;144(10):742-52 [acesso 2018 Abr 16]. http://dx.doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-144-10-200605160-00125 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-144-10-200605160-00125
Gérvas J, Fernández MP. Uma Atenção Primária forte no Brasil. Relatório sobre: como fortalecer os acertos e corrigir os erros da Estratégia de Saúde da Família. Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina de Família e Comunidade; 2011 [acesso 2018 Abr 16]. Disponível em: http://www.sbmfc.org.br/media/file/documentos/relatoriofinal_portugues.pdf
Harzheim E, org. Reforma da Atenção Primária à Saúde na cidade do Rio de Janeiro - Avaliação dos primeiros três anos de clínicas da família - Pesquisa avaliativa sobre aspectos de implantação, estrutura, processo e resultados das Clínicas da Família na cidade do Rio de Janeiro [Internet]. Porto Alegre: Editora da UFRGS; 2013 [acesso 2018 Abr 16]. Disponível em: https://www.ufrgs.br/telessauders/documentos/biblioteca_em_saude/050_material_saude_livro_reforma_aps_rj.pdf
Navarro C, Fonseca AJ, Sibajev A, Souza CIA, Araújo DS, Teles DAF, et al. Cobertura do rastreamento do câncer de colo de útero em região de alta incidência. Rev Saúde Pública. 2015;49. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0034-8910.2015049005554 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-8910.2015049005554
Ribeiro L, Bastos RR, Vieira MT, Ribeiro LC, Teixeira MTB, Leite ICG. Rastreamento oportunístico versus perdas de oportunidade: não realização do exame de Papanicolaou entre mulheres que frequentaram o pré-natal. Cad Saúde Pública. 2016;32(6):e00001415. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0102-311X00001415 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-311X00001415
Damacena AM, Luz LL, Mattos IE. Rastreamento do câncer do colo do útero em Teresina, Piauí: estudo avaliativo dos dados do Sistema de Informação do Câncer do Colo do Útero, 2006-2013. Epidemiol Serv Saúde. 2017;26(1):71-80 [acesso 2018 Abr 16]. http://dx.doi.org/10.5123/S1679-49742017000100008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5123/S1679-49742017000100008
Corrêa CSL, Lima AS, Leite ICG, Pereira LC, Nogueira MC, Duarte DAP, et al. Rastreamento do câncer do colo do útero em Minas Gerais: avaliação a partir de dados do Sistema de Informação do Câncer do Colo do Útero (SISCOLO). Cad Saúde Coletiva. 2017;25(3):315-23 [acesso 2018 Abr 16]. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1414-462X201700030201 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1414-462x201700030201
Vale DBAP, Morais SS, Pimenta AL, Zeferino LC. Avaliação do rastreamento do câncer do colo do útero na Estratégia Saúde da Família no Município de Amparo, São Paulo, Brasil. Cad Saúde Pública. 2010;26(2):383-90. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0102-311X2010000200017 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-311X2010000200017
Lourenço TS. Primeiro rastreamento organizado regional no Brasil: barreiras relacionadas à realização do exame de mamografia [Dissertação de mestrado]. Botucatu: Universidade Estadual Paulista; 2009.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
By submitting a manuscript to the RBMFC, authors retain ownership of the copyright in the article, and authorize RBMFC to publish that manuscript under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 license and identify itself as the vehicle of its original publication.