Acesso aberto a artigos, dados e materiais de pesquisa na RBMFC

Leonardo Ferreira Fontenelle; Thiago Dias Sarti

doi:10.5712/rbmfc15(42)2671

Authors

Leonardo Ferreira Fontenelle Revista Brasileira de Medicina de Família e Comunidade https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4064-433X
Thiago Dias Sarti Revista Brasileira de Medicina de Família e Comunidade https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1545-6276

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5712/rbmfc15(42)2671

Keywords:

Scholarly Communication, Editorial Policies, Open Access Publishing, Metadata, Peer Review, Research

Abstract

Open access to research articles, data and materials are some key elements of open science, a plural movement that aims to transform the creation and communication of scientific knowledge. Thanks to the publication of articles in open access and the adoption of good editorial practices, RBMFC has its articles indexed in LILACS and, more recently, in DOAJ. RBMFC also adopts the Transparency and Openness Promotion guidelines from the Center for Open Science, and makes its references in CrossRef available in the public domain, thanks to which the journal was included in the OpenCitations citation index. With this, RBMFC hopes to make research in family and community medicine and primary health care more accessible, democratic and efficient.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biographies

Leonardo Ferreira Fontenelle, Revista Brasileira de Medicina de Família e Comunidade

Graduated in medicine from UFES, medical residency in family and community medicine at FMRP/USP, master’s in community health at the same institition, Ph.D. in epidemiology at UFPel. Professor of the medical school and preceptor of the medical residency in family and community medicine at UVV, legislative analyst in health at CMV/ES, board member at ACMFC and co-editor at RBMFC.

Thiago Dias Sarti, Revista Brasileira de Medicina de Família e Comunidade

Departamento de Medicina Social, Centro de Ciências da Saúde, Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo.

References

(1) Bartling S, Friesike S. Towards another scientific revolution. In: Bartling S, Friesike S, eds. Opening science. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2014. p. 3-15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-00026-8_1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-00026-8_1

(2) Sitek D, Bertelmann R. Open access: a state of the art. In: Bartling S, Friesike S, eds. Opening science. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2014. p. 139-53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-00026-8_9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-00026-8_9

(3) Hook D, Hahnel M, Calvert I. The ascent of open access. Digital Science. 2019 Jan. DOI: https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.7618751.v2

(4) Iyandemye J, Thomas MP. Low income countries have the highest percentages of open access publication: a systematic computational analysis of the biomedical literature. PLoS ONE. 2019 Jul;14(7):e0220229. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0220229 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0220229

(5) Wise A, Estelle L. How society publishers can accelerate their transition to open access and align with Plan S. Learned Publishing. 2020 Jan;33(1):14-27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1272 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1272

(6) Alperin JP. The public impact of Latin America’s approach to open access [thesis]. Stanford, California: Stanford University; 2015.

(7) Anderson MIP, Falk JW. Editorial. Rev Bras Med Fam Comunidade. 2004 Nov;1(1):1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5712/rbmfc1(1)1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5712/rbmfc1(1)1

(8) Demarzo MMP, Milhomens DM. RBMFC em 2011: evolução e desafios. Rev Bras Med Fam Comunidade. 2011;6(21):227-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5712/rbmfc6(21)499 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5712/rbmfc6(21)499

(9) Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). Principles of transparency and best practice in scholarly publishing. Hampshire, UK: COPE; 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24318/cope.2019.1.12 DOI: https://doi.org/10.24318/cope.2019.1.12

(10) Nosek BA, Alter G, Banks GC, Borsboom D, Bowman SD, Breckler SJ, et al. Promoting an open research culture. Science. 2015 Jun;348(6242):1422-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aab2374 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aab2374

(11) Fontenelle LF, Sarti TD. Pesquisar para quê?. Rev Bras Med Fam Comunidade. 2020 Jan;15(42):2319. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5712/rbmfc15(42)2369 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5712/rbmfc15(42)2369

(12) Fontenelle LF, Sarti TD. Renovação das práticas editoriais e instruções aos autores da RBMFC a partir de 2019. Rev Bras Med Fam Comunidade. 2019 Jun;14(41):1963. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5712/rbmfc14(41)1963 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5712/rbmfc14(41)1963

(13) Shotton D. Publishing: open citations. Nature. 2013 Out;502(7471):295-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/502295a DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/502295a

(14) Shotton D. Funders should mandate open citations. Nature. 2018 Jan;553:129. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-018-00104-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-018-00104-7

(15) Chawla DS. Now free: citation data from 14 million papers, and more might come. Science. 2017 Abr. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.aal1012 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aal1012

(16) Heibi I, Peroni S, Shotton D. Software review: COCI, the OpenCitations Index of Crossref open DOI-to-DOI citations. Scientometrics. 2019 Set;121(2):1213-28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03217-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03217-6

(17) Lammey R. CrossRef developments and initiatives: an update on services for the scholarly publishing community from CrossRef. Sci Ed. 2014;1(1):13-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.2014.1.13 DOI: https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.2014.1.13

(18) Fontenelle LF, Sarti TD. Attitudes to open peer review among stakeholders of RBMFC. OSF. 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/MVC98