Dispositivo Intrauterino na Atenção Primária a Saúde:  uma revisão integrativa

Danyella da Silva  Barreto; Duana Soares  Maia; Rafael Dias Gonçalves; Ricardo de Sousa  Soares

doi:10.5712/rbmfc16(43)2821

Authors

Danyella da Silva Barreto Universidade Federal da Paraíba (UFPB), João Pessoa, PB https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7175-0074
Duana Soares Maia Universidade Federal da Paraíba (UFPB), João Pessoa, PB https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1625-0824
Rafael Dias Gonçalves Universidade Federal da Paraíba (UFPB), João Pessoa, PB https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9388-4383
Ricardo de Sousa Soares Universidade Federal da Paraíba (UFPB), João Pessoa, PB

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5712/rbmfc16(43)2821

Keywords:

Intrauterine Devices, primary health care, Family Practice Primary Health Care e Family Healt, Contraception, Comprehensive Health Care.

Abstract

Unplanned pregnancy is a worldwide reality and accounts for 40% of all pregnancies and can trigger increased maternal mortality. The Intrauterine Device (IUD) is one of the options of contraceptives offered in SUS with good effectiveness, but is still little used. Several developed countries have been looking for ways to break down barriers and increase IUD insertion rates, such as vocational training, investments in the area and education of the population. This study aims to conduct an integrative literature review on IUD-related articles in Primary Care over the past ten years.

Searches were performed at Pubmed, Scielo, LILACS and BDENF-Enfermagem using related

descriptors. Publications that addressed the IUD in Primary Health Care in the last ten years were

included. Articles resulting from original research, reviews and clinical or learning protocols were considered. After using the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 39 articles were selected and were part of the review, which were grouped into categories. The themes most repeated were the following categories: Barriers to IUD Insertion, Professional Training, Knowledge about IUD, Insertion and Continuation Rates and Others. Among the articles, only two were national. It is concluded that there are few national studies addressing IUD in PHC and that among the studies found there is a concern to identify barriers and strategies to expand the offer of the method.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biographies

Danyella da Silva Barreto, Universidade Federal da Paraíba (UFPB), João Pessoa, PB

Possui graduação em medicina pela Universidade Federal da Bahia (2005) e Residência em Medicina de Família e Comunidade pelo Grupo Hospitalar Conceição. É também especialista em Terapia de Família e Casal pelo Instituto da Família de Porto Alegre e Mestre em Psicologia Clínica pela Universidade do Vale dos Sinos (UNISINOS) - RS. Trabalha como Professora do Curso de Medicina da Universidade Federal da Paraíba e no Centro Universitário João Pessoa (UNIPE). Tem experiência na área de Medicina, com ênfase em MEDICINA DE FAMÍLIA E COMUNIDADE, atuando principalmente nos seguintes temas: medicina de família e comunidade, educação e saúde, saúde pública, terapia de família e práticas integrativas.

Duana Soares Maia, Universidade Federal da Paraíba (UFPB), João Pessoa, PB

Graduada em medicina pela UFPB, residência em Medicina de Familia e Comunidade pelo Centro Universitário de João Pessoa

Rafael Dias Gonçalves, Universidade Federal da Paraíba (UFPB), João Pessoa, PB

Graduado em medicina pela UFPB, ex-bolsista do projeto de extensão de treinamento do Dispositivo Intrauterino na Atenção Primária

Ricardo de Sousa Soares, Universidade Federal da Paraíba (UFPB), João Pessoa, PB

Graduação em medicina pela UFPB, Residência de Medicina de Familia e Comunidade no Grupo Hospitalar Conceição (2008). Especialista em Gestão em Saúde ENSP/FIOCRUZ (2010). Doutor em Modelos de Decisão em Saúde/UFPB (2016). Professor do Departamento de Promoção à Saúde na UFPB/PB

References

(1) Theme-Filha, M., Baldisserotto, M.L., Fraga, A.C.S.A. et al. Factors associated with unintended pregnancy in Brazil: cross-sectional results from the Birth in Brazil National Survey, 2011/2012. Reprod Health 13, 118 (2016). DOI: https://doi. org/10.1186/s12978-016-0227-8

(2) Dados do Sistema de Informação sobre Mortalidade (DATASUS). Acessado 08 de abril de 2021. Disponível em: http://tabnet.datasus.gov.br/cgi/tabcgi.exe?sim/cnv/mat10uf.def.

(3) OMS, UNICEF, UNFPA E DPNU.Tendencias em la mortalidade materna de 2000 a 2017. Cálculos realizados por la OMS, el UNICEF, el UNFPA, el Grupo del Banco Mundial y la División de Población de las Naciones Unidas (DPNU). Acessado em 08 de abril de 2021. Disponível em: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/332475/WHO-RHR-19.23-spa.pdf

(4) Ministério da Saúde. Sistema de Informações sobre Mortalidade – SIM. [acesso em: 23 jan. 2019. Disponível em: http://vigilancia.saude.mg.gov.br/index.php/sistemas-de-informacao/mortalidade/

(5) Jacobson L, Garbers S, Helmy H, Roobol H, Kohn JE, Kavanaugh ML. IUD services among primary care practices in NewYork City. Contraception. 2016 Mar;93(3):257-62. PMID: 26569447 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2015.11.002

(6) Gonzaga VAS, Borges ALV, Santos OAl, Rosa PLFS, Gonçalves RFS. Barreiras organizacionais para disponibilização e inserção do dispositivo intrauterino nos serviços de Atenção Básica à Aaúde. Rev. Esc. Enferm. USP [internet]. 2017;51:e03270. [acesso em 20 Nov. 2019]; Disponível em: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0080- DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/s1980220x2016046803270

(7) Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina de Familia e Comunidade. Curríículo baseado em competências para Medicina de Família e Comunidade, 2015.Acessado 07 de abril de 2021.Disponível em: http://www.sbmfc.org.br/wpcontent/uploads/media/Curriculo%20Baseado%20 em%20Competencias(1).pdf

(8) IBrasil. Ministério da Saúde. Secretaria de Atenção Primária à Saúde. Departamento de Saúde da Família. Carteira de serviços da Atenção Primária à Saúde (CaSAPS) : versão profissionais de saúde e gestores [recurso eletrônico] / Ministério da Saúde, Secretaria de Atenção Primária à Saúde, Departamento de Saúde da Família. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde, 2020.

(09) Souza MT, Silva MD, Carvalho R. Revisão Integrativa: o que é e com fazer. Eistein. [internet]. 2010;8(1):102-6. [acesso em 20 Nov. 2019] Disponível em: http://www.scielo.br/pdf/eins/v8n1/pt_1679-4508-eins-8-1-0102.

(10) Black K, Lotke P, Buhling KJ, Zite NB; Intrauterine contraception for Nulliparous women:Translating Research into Action (INTRA) group. A review of barriers and myths preventing the more widespread use of intrauterine contraception in nulliparous women. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2012 Oct;17(5):340-50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/13625187.2012.700744

(11) White K, Hopkins K, Grossman D, Potter JE. Providing Family Planning Services at Primary Care Organizations after the Exclusion of Planned Parenthood from Publicly Funded Programs in Texas: Early Qualitative Evidence. Health Serv Res. 2018 Aug;53 Suppl 1(Suppl Suppl 1):2770-86. PMID: 29053179 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.12783

(12) Borges ALV, Araújo KS, Santos AO, Gonçalves RFS, Fujimori E, Divino EA. Knowledge about the intrauterine device and interest in using it among women users of primary care services. Rev. Latino-Am. Enfermagem. 2020;28:e3232. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/15188345.3140.3232

(13) Hoopes AJ, Ahrens KR, Gilmore K, Cady J, Haaland WL, Amies Oelschlager AM, Prager S. Knowledge and Acceptability of Long-Acting Reversible Contraception Among Adolescent Women Receiving School-Based Primary Care Services. J Prim Care Community Health. 2016 Jul;7(3):165-70. PMID: 27067583 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2150131916641095

(14) Callegari LS, Parisi SM, Schwarz EB. Perceptions of intrauterine contraception among women seeking primary care. Contraception. 2013 Aug;88(2):269-74. PMID: 23521810 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2013.02.004

(15) Diaz VA, Hughes N, Dickerson LM, Wessell AM, Carek PJ. Clinician knowledge about use of intrauterine devices in adolescents in South Carolina AHEC. Fam Med. 2011 Jun;43(6):407-11. PMID: 21656395

(16) Mazza D, Bateson D, Frearson M, Goldstone P, Kovacs G, Baber R. Current barriers and potential strategies to increase the use of long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) to reduce the rate of unintended pregnancies in Australia: An expert roundtable discussion. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2017;57(2):206-12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ajo.12587

(17) Dodson NA, Gray SH, Burke PJ. Teen pregnancy prevention on a LARC: an update on long-acting reversible contraception for the primary care provider. Curr Opin Pediatr. 2012 Aug;24(4):439-45. PMID: 22732635 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/MOP.0b013e328354cc62

(18) World Health Organization Medical eligibility criteria for contraceptive use. 5th ed. 2015. Geneva, Acessado 08 de abril de 2021. Disponível em: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241549158

(19) Wu JP, Gundersen DA, Pickle S. Are the Contraceptive Recommendations of Family Medicine Educators Evidence-Based? A cera Survey Fam Med. 2016 May;48(5):345-52. PMID: 27159092

(20) Schubert FD, Herbitter C, Fletcher J, Gold M. IUD knowledge and experience among family medicine residents. Fam Med. 2015;47(6):474-7. PMID: 26039766

(21) Davis SA, Braykovr NP, Lathrop E, Haddad LB. Familiarity with Long-acting Reversible Contraceptives among Obstetrics and Gynecology, Family Medicine, and Pediatrics Residents: Results of a 2015 National Survey and Implications for Contraceptive Provision for Adolescents. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2018 Fev; 31(1):40-44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpag.2017.09.007

(22) Sridhar A, Forbes ER, Mooney K, Rible R. Knowledge and Training of Intrauterine Devices Among Primary Care Residents: Implications for Graduate Medical Education. J Grad Med Educ. 2015;7(1):9-11. PMID: 26217412 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4300/JGME-D-14-00010.1

(23) Luchetti G, Romero M. Encuesta regional sobre determinantes de la oferta e inserción del dispositivo intrauterino entre proveedores de salud / Regional Survey about Determinants of Supply and Insertion of the Intrauterine Device among Health Providers. Rev. argent. salud publica. 2017 Ene-Mar;8(30): 8-12.

(24) Harper CC, Henderson JT, Raine TR, Goodman S, Darney PD, Thompson KM, Dehlendorf C, Speidel JJ. Evidence-based IUD practice: family physicians and obstetrician-gynecologists. Fam Med. 2012 Oct;44(9):637-45. PMID: 23027156

(25) Mazza D, Black K, Taft A, Lucke J, Mcgeechan K, Haas M, Mckay H, peipert JF. Increasing the uptake of long-acting reversible contraception in general practice: the Australian Contraceptive Choice project (ACCORd) cluster randomised controlled trial protocol. BMJ Open. 2016;6(10):e012491. PMID: 27855100 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012491

(26) Garcia-Rodriguez JA, Donnon T. Using Comprehensive Video-Module Instruction as an Alternative Approach for Teaching IUD Insertion. Fam Med. 2016 Jan;48(1):15-20. PMID: 26950661

(27) Deffenbacher B, Langner S, Khodaee M. Are Self-study Procedural Teaching Methods Effective? A Pilot Study of a Family Medicine Residency Program. Fam Med. 2017 Nov;49(10):789-95.

(28) Pace LE, Dolan BM, Tishler LW, Gooding HC, Bartz D. Incorporating Long-acting Reversible Contraception Into Primary Care: A Training and Practice Innovation. Womens Health Issues. 2016; 26(2):131-4. PMID: 26542381 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.whi.2015.09.004

(29) Lewis C, Darney P, Thiel De Bocanegra H. Intrauterine contraception: impact of provider training on participant knowledge and provision. Contraception. 2013 Aug;88(2):226-31. PMID: 23845208 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2013.06.004

(30) Mazza D, Watson CJ, Taft A, Lucke J, Mcgeechan K, Haas M, Mcnamee K, Peipert JF, Black KI. Increasing long-acting reversible contraceptives: the Australian Contraceptive ChOice pRoject (ACCORd) cluster randomized trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Apr;222(4S):S921.e1-S921.e13. PMID: 31837291 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2019.11.1267

(31) Pahle AS, Sorli D, Kristiansen IS, Deraas TS, Halvorsen PA. Practice variation in surgical procedures and IUD-insertions among general practitioners in Norway - a longitudinal study. BMC Fam Pract. 2017;18(1):7. PMID: 28109245 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-017- 0581-9

(32) Cea-Soriano L, García Rodríguez LA, Machlitt A, Wallander MA. Use of prescription contraceptive methods in the UK general population: a primary care study. BJOG. 2014 Jan;121(1):53-60. PMID: 24118863 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.12465

(33) Rubin SE, Cohen HW, Santelli JS, Mckee MD. Counseling Adolescents About the Intrauterine Contraceptive Device: A Comparison of Primary Care Pediatricians With Family Physicians and Obstetrician-Gynecologists in the Bronx, New York. J Prim Care Community Health. 2015;6(3):162-9. PMID: 25628297 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2150131914568460

(34) Harper CC, Speidel JJ, Drey EA, Trussell J, Blum M, Darney PD. Copper intrauterine device for emergency contraception: clinical practice among contraceptive providers. Obstet Gynecol. 2012 Feb;119(2 Pt 1):220-6. PMID: 22270272 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182429e0d

(35) Banerjee SK, Gulati S, Andersen KL, Acre V, Warvadekar J, Navin D. Associations Between Abortion Services and Acceptance of Postabortion Contraception in Six Indian States. Stud Fam Plann. 2015 Dec;46(4):387-403. PMID: 26643489 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4465.2015.00039.x

(36) Pohjoranta E, Suhonen S, Mentula M, Heikinheimo O. Intrauterine contraception after medical abortion: factors affecting success of early insertion. Contraception. 2017;95(3):257-62. PMID: 27836586 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2016.10.012

(37) Armitage CM, Mitchell C, Wigan C, Smith DA. Uptake and continuation rates of the intrauterine system in a university student general practice population in the UK. J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care. 2013 Jul;39(3):186-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/jfprhc-2012-100392

(38) Amico J, Wu J. Providing Long-Acting Reversible Contraception in an Academic Family Medicine Center. Fam Med. 2015 Oct;47(9):727-31.

(39) Cea-Soriano L, Wallander MA, Andersson S, Filonenko A, García-Rodríguez LA. The continuation rates of long-acting reversible contraceptives in UK general practice using data from The Health Improvement Network. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2015;24(1):52-8. PMID: 25250863 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/pds.3710

(40) Sznajder KK, Tomaszewski KS, Burke AE, Trent M. Incidence of Discontinuation of Long-Acting Reversible Contraception among Adolescent and Young Adult Women Served by an Urban Primary Care Clinic. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2017;30(1):53-7. DOI: https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.jpag.2016.06.012

(41) Gupta JK, Daniels JP, Middleton LJ, Pattison HM, Prilestzky G, Roberts TE, Sanghera S, Barton P, Gray R, Kai J. A randomised controlled trial of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system in primary care against standard treatment for menorrhagia: the ECLIPSE trial. Health Technol Assess. 2015;19(88):i-xxv, 1-118 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3310/hta19880

(42) Abdul-Aziz M, Mahdy MAK, Abdul-Ghani R, Alhilali NA, Al-Mujahed LKA, Alabsi SA, Al-Shawish FAM, Alsarari NJM, Bamashmos W, Abdulwali SJH, AL Karawani M, Almikhlafy AA. Bacterial vaginosis, vulvovaginal candidiasis and trichomonal vaginitis among reproductive- aged women seeking primary healthcare in Sana’a city, Yemen. BMC Infect Dis. 2019 Oct 22;19(1):879. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-019-4549-3

(43) Antell K, Deshmukh P, Brown EJ. Contraception Update: Intrauterine Devices. FP Essent. 2017 Nov;462:20-4. PMID: 29172412

(44) Ma R, Brown E. An evaluation of commissioning arrangements for intrauterine and subdermal contraception services from general practitioners in London, UK. J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care. 2015;41(1):54-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/jfprhc-2013-100831

(45) Cea Soriano L, Wallander MA, Andersson SW, Requena G, García-Rodríguez LA. Study of long-acting reversible contraceptive use in a UK primary care database: validation of methodology. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2014;19(1):22-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/13625187.2013.852170

(46) Cook L, Fleming C. What is the actual cost of providing the intrauterine system for contraception in a UK community sexual and reproductive health setting? J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care. 2014 Jan;40(1):46-53 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/jfprhc-2012-100377