List of patients

reflections for the practice of family and community medicine

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5712/rbmfc16(43)2856

Keywords:

Family Practice, Family Health Strategy, Reimbursement Mechanisms, Contracts, Workload.

Abstract

This article discusses the theme of patient list as a model for registering the population to the Primary Health Care (PHC) teams. Objective: to highlight the characteristics of patient list as a payment model. Method: theoretical essay on payment models that analyses the pilot of patient list of the Municipal Health Secretariat (MHS) of Florianopolis. To support the principles of the patient list, its application is presented in two different contexts: (a) in closed health systems, as in the Health Maintenance Organizations (HMO) in the United States; and (b) in universal health systems, using the British health system as a model. Discussion: the Florianopolis MHS patient list pilot-project faces two structural problems: (a) the universal health system that characterises Brazilian PHC; and (b) the salary payment model. These two components pose the challenge of establishing a real cap for patient lists. Without a limit on the number of patients, it is not possible to adjust health professionals’ workload. Additionally, a list of patients based on repeated use and on the care of out-of-list acute cases tend to increase the workload of professionals over time. Nonetheless, the proposed list of patients provides greater visibility of the workload facilitating both management and monitoring of care pressure and the internal redistribution of patients among the PHC health teams. It also makes it possible to justify the expansion of Family Health Strategy (FHS) teams according to more reliable data on the reality of services and to implement quality improvement programmes. Conclusion: the implementation of the flexible registering modality in Florianopolis does not have direct positive impacts on the workload of health teams, but perhaps it does indirectly through intelligent management of its PHC system.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biography

Armando Henrique Norman, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC), Florianópolis, SC

References

(1) Starfield B, Shi L, Macinko J. Contribution of primary care to health systems and health. Milbank Quaterly. 2005;83(3):457-502. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0009.2005.00409.x

(2) Norman AH, Tesser CD. Acesso ao cuidado na Estratégia Saúde da Família: equilíbrio entre demanda espontânea e prevenção/ promoção da saúde. Saúde e Soc. 2015;24(1):165-179. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104- 12902015000100013

(3) Tesser CD, Norman AH. Repensando o acesso ao cuidado na Estratégia Saúde da Família. Saúde e Soc. 2014;23(3):869-883. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-12902014000300011

(4) Sampaio, LFR. The Brazilian health system: highlighting the primary health care reform. Ital J Public Health. 2010;7(4):359-368.

(5) Giovanella L, Franco CM, de Almeida PF. National primary health care policy: Where are we headed to? Cienc e Saude Coletiva. 2020;25(4):1475-1482. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-81232020254.01842020

(6) Rede APS. Lista de pacientes na Atenção Primária à Saúde em Florianópolis. https://redeaps.org.br/2019/07/08/lista-de-pacientes-na- atencao-primaria-a-saude-em-florianopolis/. Published 2019. Accessed December 31, 2020.

(7) ABRASCO. Fortalecer o SUS, em Defesa da Democracia e da Vida. https://www.abrasco.org.br/site/publicacoes/fortalecer-o-sus-em- defesa-da-democracia-e-da-vida/53604/. Published 2020. Accessed January 2, 2021.

(8) Murray M, Davies M, Boushon B. Panel Size: How Many Patients Can One Doctor Manage? Fam Pract Manag. 2007; 14:44-51. PMID: 17458336

(9) Murray M, Davies M, Boushon B. Panel Size: Answers to physicians’ frequently asked questions. Fam Pract Manag. 2007;14(10):29-32. PMID: 18046954

(10) Weber R, Murray M. The Right-Sized Patient Panel: A Practical Way to Make Adjustments for Acuity and Complexity. Fam Pract Manag. 2019; 26: 23-29. PMID: 31714049

(11) Serapioni M, Tesser CD. O Sistema de Saúde brasileiro ante a tipologia internacional: uma discussão prospectiva e inevitável. Saúde em Debate. 2019;43(spe5):44-57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-11042019s504

(12) Norman AH. Estratégias que viabilizam o acesso aos serviços de Atenção Primária à Saúde no Reino Unido. Rev Bras Med Família e Comunidade. 2019;14(41):1945. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5712/rbmfc14(41)1945

(13) Beale N. Unequal to the task: Deprivation, health and UK general practice at the millennium. Br J Gen Pract. 2001;51(467):478-480+483. PMID: 11407055

(14) The King’s Fund. Improving the quality of care in general practice. https://www.kingsfund.org.uk/publications/improving-quality-care- general-practice. Published 2011. Accessed December 31, 2020.

(15) White KL, Williams TF, Greenberg BG. The ecology of medical care 1961. Bull New York Acad Med J Urban Heal. 1996;73(1):187-204. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM196111022651805

(16) Simon C. Overview of the GP contract. InnovAiT. 2008;1(2):134-139. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/innovait/ inn010

(17) Norman AH, Russell AJ, Macnaughton J. The payment for performance model and its influence on British general practitioners’ principles and practice. Cad Saude Publica. 2014;30(1):55-67. PMID: 24627013 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-311X00149912

(18) Gérvas J. Formas de pago a médicos generales/de familia - Acta Sanitaria. https://www.actasanitaria.com/formas-de-pago-a-medicos- generales-de-familia/. Published 2019. Accessed January 1, 2021.

(19) Robinson JC. Theory and practice in the design of physician payment incentives. Milbank Quaterly. 2001;79(2):149-177. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0009.00202

(20) Carlsen B, Norheim OF. Introduction of the patient-list system in general practice: Changes in Norwegian physicians’ perception of their gatekeeper role. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2003;21(4):209-213. PMID: 14695070 DOI: https://doi. org/10.1080/02813430310004155

(21) L’Esperance V, Gravelle H, Schofield P, Ashworth M. Impact of primary care funding on patient satisfaction: a retrospective longitudinal study of English general practice, 2013–2016. Br J Gen Pract. 2020;71(702): PMID: 33257459 DOI: https:// doi.org/10.3399/bjgp21X714233

(22) Gusso GDF, Knupp D, Trindade TG da, Junior NL, Neto PP. Bases para um Novo Sanitarismo. Rev Bras Med Família e Comunidade. 2015;10(36). DOI: https://doi.org/10.5712/rbmfc10(36)1056

(23) BMA. Global sum allocation formula. https://www.bma.org.uk/advice-and-support/gp-practices/funding-and-contracts/global-sum- allocation-formula. Published 2020. Accessed December 31, 2020.

(24) Conselho Municipal de Saúde. Reunião ampliada da câmara técnica - Lista de pacientes (2020-12-11 at 08:58 GMT-8) - Google Drive. https://drive.google.com/file/d/1A_9WOKWNT7E7D2Sf9D3m_2py5qD3T3Gk/view. Published 2020. Accessed January 6, 2021.

Published

2021-05-30

How to Cite

1.
Norman AH. List of patients: reflections for the practice of family and community medicine. Rev Bras Med Fam Comunidade [Internet]. 2021 May 30 [cited 2024 Jul. 22];16(43):2856. Available from: https://rbmfc.org.br/rbmfc/article/view/2856

Issue

Section

Research Articles

Plaudit