Empathy (part I)
contributions to a person-centered approach
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5712/rbmfc19(46)3398Keywords:
Empathy, Family practice, Physician-patient relations, Education, medical, Nonviolent communication.,Abstract
Introduction: This article explores the theme of empathy in the doctor-patient relationship. Objective: To contribute to the improvement of clinical communication skills by reviewing the understanding and application of empathy in clinical practice. Methods: A non-systematic review of the main books used in clinical communication on the topic of empathy. The methodological approach consisted in the following steps: (1) An intentional sample of the literature; (2) Data collection and reading, i.e., extracting fragments from texts; (3) Content analysis, focusing on definition, importance and instrumentalization for practical application; (4) Selection and synthesis to facilitate understanding and contextualization on the topic; and (5) Comparison and ponderance of the selected content. Results: The scope within which empathy was worked on in the selected literature resulted in three levels of empathic density: low, moderate, and high. Thus, low empathic density was limited to definition and importance; moderate density incorporated some examples of how to apply empathy in a fragmented way; high empathic density addressed the topic more fully, facilitating instrumentation in clinical practice. There is agreement in the literature analyzed that the practice of empathy reflects on the improvement of medical care. However, its exercise remains in the rational field. By exemplifying the practical application of empathy, the authors suggest that the physician adopt a non-judgmental posture, while proposing an imaginative exercise of guessing the patient’s feelings/emotions. Although high-density empathy authors understand the importance of emotions and name them in the process, there is a need for an unfolding and deepening from this point on. Conclusions: Empathy is a complex subject with several nuances and is approached in different ways in the selected literature. This evidences its richness and originality, at the same time that it presents gaps for the application of empathy in clinical practice.
Downloads
Metrics
References
McWhinney IR. William Pickles Lecture 1996. The importance of being different. Br J Gen Pract 1996;46(408):433-6. PMID: 8776918
Dohms M, Gusso G. Comunicação clínica: aperfeiçoando os encontros em saúde. Porto Alegre: Artmed; 2021.
Silverman J, Kurtz S, Draper J. Skills for Communicating with Patients. New York: CRC Press; 2013.
Stewart M, Brown JB, Weston WW, McWhinney IR, McWilliam CL, Freeman TR. Medicina centrada na pessoa: transformando o método clínico. Porto Alegre: Artmed; 2010.
Mahendran A. Improving your communication skills. BMJ Careers 2014 [Internet]. [acessado em 01 jun. 2023]. Disponível em: https://www.bmj.com/careers/article/improving-your-communication-skills.
McWhinney IR, Freeman T. Manual de Medicina de Família e Comunidade. Porto Alegre: Artmed; 2010.
Gupta R. BEST: a communication model. BMJ 2006;333(7560):s35LP-s35. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.333.7560.s35 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.333.7560.s35
Bradshaw P. Good communication reduces risk of a complaint or claim. BMJ 2019;367. https://doi.org/10.1136/BMJ.L6160 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l6160
Norman AH, Tesser CD. Medicina de família e prevenção quaternária: uma longa história. Rev Bras Med Fam Comunidade 2021;16(43):2502. https://doi.org/10.5712/RBMFC16(43)2502 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5712/rbmfc16(43)2502
Lakasing E. Michael Balint--an outstanding medical life. Br J Gen Pract 2005;55(518):724-5. PMID: 16176748
Balint M. The doctor, his patient, and the illness. Lancet 1955;265(6866):683-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(55)91061-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(55)91061-8
Norman AH, Tesser CD. Prevenção quaternária: as bases para sua operacionalização na relação médico-paciente. Rev Bras Med Fam Comunidade 2015;10(35):1. https://doi.org/10.5712/rbmfc10(35)1011 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5712/rbmfc10(35)1011
Ramos V. A consulta em 7 passos. execução e análise crítica de consultas em medicina geral e familiar. Lisboa: VFBM Comunicação Ltda;2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32385/rpmgf.v25i2.10609
Herrera Ornelas R, Pico da Cruz MR. Construção da relação. In: Dohms M, Gusso G. Comunicação clínica: aperfeiçoando os encontros em saúde. Porto Alegre: Artmed; 2021.
Carrió FB. Entrevista clínica: habilidades de comunicação para profissionais de saúde. Porto Alegre: Artmed; 2009.
Neighbour R. The inner consultation: how to develop an effective and intuitive consulting style. New York: CRC Press; 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1201/9780203736548
Grosseman S, Dohms M. Comunicação com emoções fortes: resposta empática à raiva, ao medo e à tristeza no cuidado em saúde. In: Dohms M, Gusso G. Comunicação clínica: aperfeiçoando os encontros em saúde. Porto Alegre: Artmed; 2021.
Moulton L. The naked consultation. New York: CRC Press; 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315379463
Coulehan JL, Platt FW, Egener B, Frankel R, Lin C-T, Lown B, et al. Let me see if I have this right...: words that help build empathy. Ann Intern Med 2001;135(3):221-7. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-135-3-200108070-00022 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-135-3-200108070-00022
Tan L, Le MK, Yu CC, Liaw SY, Tierney T, HO YY, et al. Defining clinical empathy: a grounded theory approach from the perspective of healthcare workers and patients in a multicultural setting. BMJ Open 2021;11(9):e045224. https://doi.org/10.1136/BMJOPEN-2020-045224 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045224
Kerasidou A, Bærøe K, Berger Z, Caruso Brown AE. The need for empathetic healthcare systems. J Med Ethics 2021;47(12):e27-e27. https://doi.org/10.1136/MEDETHICS-2019-105921 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2019-105921
Chen Y. A good doctor is empathetic to all. BMJ 2019;366:l5658. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l5658 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l5658
Howick J, Moscrop A, Mebius A, Fanshawe TR, Lewith G, Bishop FL, et al. Effects of empathic and positive communication in healthcare consultations: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JR Soc Med 2018;111(7):240. https://doi.org/10.1177/0141076818769477 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0141076818769477
Hashim MJ. Patient-centered communication: basic skills. Am Fam Physician 2017;95(1):29-34. PMID: 28075109
Rosenberg MB. comunicação não-violenta: técnicas para aprimorar relacionamentos pessoais e profissionais. São Paulo: Ágora; 2006.
Shanmugam R. Finding the equilibrium of empathy. BMJ 2022;378:o2288. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.o2288 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.o2288
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Beatriz Yumi Uehara, Armando Henrique Norman, Thaís de Almeida Morgado
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
By submitting a manuscript to the RBMFC, authors retain ownership of the copyright in the article, and authorize RBMFC to publish that manuscript under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 license and identify itself as the vehicle of its original publication.