Consulting the article
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5712/rbmfc6(20)383Keywords:
Journal Article, Education, Medical, Continuing, EvaluationAbstract
The concept of journal club is known among physicians since the undergraduate years, particularly from the presentations of published studies in scientific reunions during different clinical stages. A parallelism can be drawn between the clinical activity of the general practitioner and a journal club. In fact, just as a consultation with the patient, a journal club implies to read (or hear) the article, to question certain aspects in order to obtain certain data, to wait for a guiding answer, to be attentive to details, and to get the essential (subjective). As a physical examination, it implies to inspect the study design, to palpate the limitations, and to strike the results in the community (objective). After a complete reading, the general practitioner will evaluate it (evaluation) and plan (plan) a change in his/her practice. This process takes place with the natural flow of a normal consultation, where the patient would be, in this case, the article itself.Downloads
Metrics
References
Sanchez JP. Simplesmente POEMs. Rev Port Clin Geral. 2005; 21(6): 631-4.
Mateus M, Sanchez JP. POEMs e Níveis de Evidência. Rev Port Clin Geral. 2006; 22: 400-4.
Ramos V. A consulta em 7 passos. Execução e análise crítica das consultas em medicina geral e familiar. Rev Port Clin Geral. 2009; 25: 208-20.
Carneiro AV. Como avaliar a investigação clínica. O exemplo da avaliação crítica de um ensaio clínico. J Port Gastroenterol. 2008; 15: 30-6.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
By submitting a manuscript to the RBMFC, authors retain ownership of the copyright in the article, and authorize RBMFC to publish that manuscript under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 license and identify itself as the vehicle of its original publication.