Family approach in Primary Health Care with families experiencing violence
perceptions of preceptors in Family Practice Residency
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5712/rbmfc20(47)3972Keywords:
Domestic violence, Family practice, Primary health care, Internship and residency, Professional-family relationsAbstract
Introduction: Violence is a severe and frequent public health issue. It has an impact on the health and lives of individuals, families, and communities, whether physically, psychologically, or socially. Among types of violence, domestic violence has a high prevalence; it has a systemic character, meaning all family members are somehow involved. In Primary Health Care (PHC), families experiencing violence are often attended to by professionals from the Family Health Strategy. However, there is an observed absence or little space in medical education addressing the issue. Objective: To understand the perspective of Family Practice Physicians (FPP), preceptors of Residency Programs in FPP, on the Family Approach in contexts of domestic violence in PHC. Methods: This is a qualitative study with a descriptive and exploratory character. A survey on the topic was applied to active preceptors in Rio de Janeiro at the time of the research, followed by interviews with 15 of these preceptors. Results: There were identified potentials and challenges for the daily practice of the Family Approach with families in violent situations in PHC. As advantages/ potentials, the following stood out: strengthening of the bond between the professional and the family; expanding therapeutic resources and intervention effectiveness; promoting comprehensive care; networking across sectors; promoting reflection and self-care within families. Among the challenges reported were gaps in medical education and lack of practical experience in addressing the problem; silenced violence and fear of addressing domestic violence situations; lack of specific guidelines for PHC health professionals; poor working conditions, excessive designated population, care overload, difficulties in intersectoral networking, and management undervaluing the importance of the approach. Conclusions: The importance of the Family Approach by FPP was highlighted by the respondents as strategic in addressing domestic violence. However, there are many challenges to its practical application. Efforts and guidelines are needed for FPP and other professionals working in PHC to be valued, enabled, and trained to systematically and regularly address both family issues and domestic violence, considering its high prevalence and severity.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Krug EG. World report on violence and health. Genebra: World Health Organization; 2002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(02)11133-0
Schenker M, Avanci JC, Silveira LMB. Violência intrafamiliar da perspectiva sistêmica. In: Souza Minayo MCS, Assis SG, editores. Novas e Velhas Faces da Violência no Século XXI: visão da literatura brasileira do campo da saúde. Rio de Janeiro: Fiocruz; 2017. p. 239-253.
Kiss LB, Schraiber LB. Temas médico-sociais e a intervenção em saúde: a violência contra mulheres no discurso dos
profissionais. Ciênc Saúde Coletiva 2011;16(3):1943-52. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-81232011000300028 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-81232011000300028
Machado JC, Rodrigues VP, Vilela ABA, Simões AV, Morais RLGL, Rocha EN. Violência intrafamiliar e as estratégias de atuação da equipe de Saúde da Família. Saúde Soc. 2014;23(3):828-40. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-12902014000300008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-12902014000300008
McDaniel SH, Campbell TL, Hepworth J, Lorenz A, editors. Family-oriented primary care. 2ª ed. Estados Unidos: Springer;
2005. 477 p.
Asen E, Tomson D, Young V, Tomson P. Ten minutes for the family: systemic interventions in primary care. Nova York:
Routledge; 2004.
Bardin L. Análise de conteúdo. Lisboa: Edições 70; 2016.
Silva AH, Fossá MIT. Análise de conteúdo: exemplo de aplicação da técnica para análise de dados qualitativos. Qualitas. 2015;1-14.
Guimarães FG, Mendes AO. Abuso infantil. In: Gusso G, Lopes JMC, Dias LC, editors. Tratado de medicina de família e
comunidade: princípios, formação e prática. 2ª ed. Porto Alegre: Artmed; 2019. p. 1036-1043.
Brum CRS, Lourenço LM, Gebara CFP, Ronzani TM. Violência doméstica e crenças: intervenção com profissionais da atenção primária à saúde. Psicol Pesq. 2013;7(2):242-50. https://doi.org/10.24879/201300700200275 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5327/Z1982-1247201300020012
Castro AA, Moura ATMS, Rafael RMR. A violência familiar sob a ótica da promoção da saúde: a trajetória do município do
Rio de Janeiro. Rev APS. 2016;19(1):115-21.
Schenker M, Cavalcante FG. Violência, família e sociedade. In: Njaine K, Assis SG, Constantino P, editores. Impactos da
violência na saúde. Rio de Janeiro: Editora Fiocruz; 2007. p. 57-77.
D’Oliveira AFPL, Schraiber LB. Abordagem à violência doméstica. In: Gusso G, Lopes JMC, Dias LC, editores. Tratado de
medicina de família e comunidade. 2ª ed. Porto Alegre: Artmed; 2019. p. 701-9.
Margarido A, Próspero ENS, Grillo LP. Violência doméstica contra crianças e adolescentes: Formação e conhecimento dos
médicos. Psicol Argum. 2017;31(74):405-14. https://doi.org/10.7213/psicol.argum.31.074.DS04 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7213/psicol.argum.31.074.DS04
Pedrosa CM, Spink MJP. A violência contra mulher no cotidiano dos serviços de saúde: desafios para a formação médica. Saúde Soc. 2011;20(1):124-35. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-12902011000100015 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-12902011000100015
Anderson MIP, Astudillo X, Arias-Castillo L, Bartolomé C, Guerrero JS, Meoño T, et al. Medicina Familiar, Atención Primaria y Violencia: formación y acción en Iberoamérica. Rev Bras Med Fam Comunidade. 2018;13(Supl. 1):9-28. https://doi. org/10.5712/rbmfc13(40)1850
Moreira TNF, Martins CL, Feuerwerker LCM, Schraiber LB. A construção do cuidado: o atendimento às situações de violência doméstica por equipes de Saúde da Família. Saúde Soc. 2014;23(3):814-27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-12902014000300007
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Renata Chaves, Maria Inez Padula Anderson

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
By submitting a manuscript to the RBMFC, authors retain ownership of the copyright in the article, and authorize RBMFC to publish that manuscript under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 license and identify itself as the vehicle of its original publication.