Overscreening or prevention in a human scale? Excessive screening
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5712/rbmfc10(35)1068Keywords:
Overscreening, Mass screening, Physician-Patient Relations, Quaternary Prevention, MedicalizationAbstract
When screening is applied in an excessive, unnecessary or abusive manner, the damage may outweigh the benefits. In order do develop the concept of excessive screening some categories were considered: unnecessary screening, screening without medical indication, induced screening, mandatory screening, and inadequate frequency screening. There are biases of interpretation that do not allow objectively determining the balance of harms and benefits of screening programmes related to overdiagnosis. To prevent damage from excessive screening (overscreening) it is necessary to move from the domain of generic recommendations and guidelines to the clinical practice ground of individual cases. The quaternary prevention, conceptually grounded in person-centred health care, comprises the beliefs, interests, and individual options, making it possible to lead prevention to a human scale.Downloads
Metrics
References
Ministério da Saúde (BR), Secretaria de Atenção à Saúde. Departamento de Atenção Básica. Rastreamento. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde; 2010. (Série A. Normas e Manuais Técnicos Cadernos de Atenção Primária, n. 29).
Norman HA, Tesser CD. Rastreamento de doenças. In: Gusso GDF, Lopes JMC. Tratado de medicina de família e comunidade: princípios, formação e prática. Porto Alegre: Artmed; 2012. p. 521-532.
Gates TJ. Screening for cancer: evaluating the evidence. Am Fam Physician. [Internet] 2000 [última consulta el 2015 Jun 17] ;63(3):513-522. Disponible en: http://www.aafp.org/afp/2001/0201/p513.pdf.
Colin S. Collins Spanish-English, English-Spanih dictionary. 3a ed. Barcelona: Ediciones Grijalbo; 1994.
Skrabanek P. Shadows over screening mammography. Clin Radiol. 1989;40(1):4-5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0009-9260(89)80003-0. PMid:2920517. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0009-9260(89)80003-0
McMaster H, Arroll B. Screening for cervical cancer: attitudes and policies among Auckland general practitioners. N Z Med J. 1992;105(931):125- 127. PMid:1560922.
MeSH Browser [Internet]. Bethesda (MD): National Library of Medicine (U.S.); 2002 [última consulta el 2014 Oct 25]; [1 pantalla]. Disponible en: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/?term=overscreening.
Brodersen J, Siersma VD. Long-term psychosocial consequences of false-positive screening mammography. Ann Fam Med. 2013;11(2):106-115. http://dx.doi.org/10.1370/afm.1466. PMid:23508596. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.1466
Gérvas J. Prevención cuaternaria en ancianos. Rev Esp Geriatr Gerontol. 2012;47(6):266-269. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.regg.2012.07.001. PMid:23062686. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regg.2012.07.001
Lenzer J, Brownlee S. US expert panel recommends against prostate cancer screening. BMJ. 2011;343:d6479. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d6479. PMid:21987717. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d6479
Brownlee S, Lenzer J. Can cancer ever be ignored? [Internet]. 2011 Oct 5 [última consulta el 2014 Oct 19]. The New York Times Magazine; 2011. Disponible en: www.nytimes.com/2011/10/09/magazine/can-cancer-ever-be-ignored.html?_r=2&ref=magazine.
Sullivan T. Evidence does not support blanket prostate cancer testing recommendation [Internet] 2013 Sept 5 [última consulta el 2014 Oct 19]. Healthy Debate; 2013. Disponible en: http://healthydebate.ca/opinions/a-popular-belief-that-early-detection-of-cancer-is-best-does-not-make-it-so.
Moyer VA, U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for prostate cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med. 2012;157(2):120-134. http://dx.doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-157-2-201207170-00459. PMid:22801674. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-157-2-201207170-00459
Welch HG, Black WC. Using autopsy series to estimate the disease “reservoir” for ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: how much more breast cancer can we find? Ann Intern Med. 1997;127(11):1023-1028. http://dx.doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-127-11-199712010-00014. PMid:9412284. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-127-11-199712010-00014
Borzekowski DL, Guan Y, Smith KC, Erby LH, Roter DL. The Angelina effect: immediate reach, grasp, and impact of going public. Genet Med. 2014;16(7):516-521. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/gim.2013.181. PMid:24357847. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/gim.2013.181
Arie S. Uruguay’s mandatory breast cancer screening for working women aged 40-59 is challenged. BMJ. 2013;346:f1907. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.f1907. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.f1907
Pizzanelli Báez EM. Principios Éticos y Prevención Cuaternaria: ¿es posible no proteger el ejercicio del principio de autonomía? Rev Bras Med Fam Comunidade. 2014;9(31):169-73. http://dx.doi.org/10.5712/rbmfc9(31)852. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5712/rbmfc9(31)852
Welch HG. Should I be tested for cancer? Maybe not, and here’s why. Berkeley: University of California Press; 2004.
Greaves M. Does everyone develop covert cancer? Nat Rev Cancer. 2014;14(4):209-210. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nrc3703. PMid:25688403. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrc3703
Zahl PH, Gøtzsche PC, Mæhlen J. Natural history of breast cancers detected in the Swedish mammography screening programme: a cohort study. Lancet Oncol. 2011;12(12):1118-1124. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70250-9. PMid:21996169. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70250-9
Brodersen J, Schwartz LM, Woloshin S. Overdiagnosis: how cancer screening can turn indolent pathology into illness. APMIS. 2014;122(8):683- 689. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/apm.12278. PMid:24862511. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/apm.12278
Welch HG; Schwartz LM; Woloshin S. Are increasing 5-year survival rates evidence of success against cancer? JAMA. 2000;283:2975-2978. PMID: 10865276. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.283.22.2975
Esserman L, Shieh Y, Thompson I. Rethinking screening for breast cancer and prostate cancer. JAMA. 2009;302(15):1685-1692. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.2009.1498. PMid:19843904. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2009.1498
Sandblom G, Varenhorst E, Rosell J, Löfman O, Carlsson P. Randomised prostate cancer screening trial: 20 year follow-up. BMJ. 2011;(31):342:d1539. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d1539. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d1539
Hewitson P, Glasziou P, Irwig L, Towler B, Watson E. Screening for colorectal cancer using the faecal occult blood test, Hemoccult. Rev. Cochrane Database Syst. 2007;(1):CD001216. PMID: 17253456. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001216.pub2
Kronborg O, Fenger C, Olsen J, Jørgensen OD, Søndergaard O. Randomised study of screening for colorectal cancer with faecal-occult-blood test. Lancet. 1996;348:1467-1471. PMID: 8942774. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(96)03430-7
Brenner H, Tao S, Haug U. Low-dose aspirin use and performance of immunochemical fecal occult blood tests. JAMA. 2010;304(22):2513-2520. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.2010.1773. PMid:21139112. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2010.1773
Sacket D. Hormone replacement therapy. The arrogance of preventive medicine. CMAJ. [Internet]. 2002 [última consulta el 2015 Jun 17];167(4):363-364. Disponible en: http://www.cmaj.ca/content/167/4/363.full.pdf.
Menéndez E. El modelo médico y la salud de los trabajadores. Salud Colectiva. 2005;1(1):9-32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18294/sc.2005.1
Halfmann D. Recognizing medicalization and demedicalization: discourses, practices, and identities. Health (London). 2012;16(2):186-207. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1363459311403947.PMid:21540251.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
By submitting a manuscript to the RBMFC, authors retain ownership of the copyright in the article, and authorize RBMFC to publish that manuscript under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 license and identify itself as the vehicle of its original publication.