Expanded access to intra-uterine devices

impact of a work process promoting autonomy in contraception

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5712/rbmfc19(46)3975

Keywords:

Contraception, Family development planning, Intrauterine devices, Empowerment for health, Women’s health.

Abstract

Introduction: Intrauterine device (IUD) is one of the most effective contraceptive strategies. Despite being widely distributed by the Brazilian Unified Health System (Sistema Único de Saúde – SUS), there is low adherence to the method. There are several barriers to this situation, such as lack of knowledge about the device, in addition to the reduced offer for contraceptive insertion by primary health care providers. Given that increased access to the IUD can contribute to reducing unplanned pregnancies, as well as empowering women, some strategies have been developed by a primary health care team to facilitate access to IUDs. Objective: This research reflected on the impact of incorporating health education strategies to disseminate the method and reduction of barriers to insertion, broadening IUD access, the number of devices inserted, the number of unplanned pregnancy and the possibility of increased female empowerment. Methods: Data were extracted from information present in spreadsheets and reports produced by the team itself. Descriptive statistics were used to present and analyze the data obtained, using tools for formulating graphics and tables. Results: After changing the work process to expanded access to IUD insertion, an increase in the number of procedures and the percentage of planned pregnancies was observed. Conclusions: The IUD appears as an instrument to enable the exercise of sexual and reproductive rights and to leverage women’s emancipatory attitudes. The fewer barriers women encounter when inserting an IUD, the greater the choice for this method, with insertion being on spontaneous demand and continuing education activities, powerful tools to enable greater access to it. Long-term studies are necessary for these hypotheses to be evaluated, however, there appears to be a positive link between these two variables.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Foucault M. Microfísica do poder. 27a. ed. Rio de Janeiro: Ed. Graal; 2009.

Freitas GL. Discutindo a política de atenção à saúde da mulher no contexto da promoção da saúde. Rev Eletrônica Enferm 2009;11(2):424-8. https://doi.org/10.5216/ree.v11.47053 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5216/ree.v11.47053

Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. Secretaria de Atenção à Saúde. Departamento de Ações Programáticas Estratégicas. Política nacional de atenção integral à saúde da mulher: princípios e diretrizes. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde; 2004.

Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. Secretaria de Atenção à Saúde. Departamento de Ações Programáticas Estratégicas. Área Técnica de Saúde da Mulher. Direitos sexuais e direitos reprodutivos: uma prioridade do governo. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde; 2005.

Biblioteca Virtual em Saúde. Atenção Primária em Saúde. O que é planejamento familiar? [Internet]. 2009 [acessado em 1 out. 2023]. Disponível em: https://aps-repo.bvs.br/aps/o-que-e-planejamento-familiar/

Baker D, Keogh S, Luchsinger G, Roseman M, Sedgh G, Solo J. Vendo o invisível: em defesa da ação na negligencia da crise da gravidez não intencional [Internet]. Brasília: Fundo das Nações Unidas para a População; 2022 [acessado em 26 fev. 2023]. Disponível em: https://brazil.unfpa.org/pt-br/publications/situacao-da-populacao-mundial-2022

Sedgh G, Singh S, Hussain R. Intended and unintended pregnancies worldwide in 2012 and recent trends. Stud Fam Plann 2014;45(3):301-14. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4465.2014.00393.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4465.2014.00393.x

Penna IAA, Brito MB. A importância da contracepção de longo prazo reversível. Femina. 2015;43(Supl 1):1-6.

Cleland J, Conde-Agudelo A, Peterson H, Ross J, Tsui A. Contraception and health. Lancet 2012;380(9837):149-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60609-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60609-6

Secura GM, Allsworth JE, Madden T, Mullersman JL, Peipert JF. The contraceptive CHOICE project: reducing barriers to long-acting reversible contraception. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010;203(2):115.e1-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2010.04.017 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2010.04.017

Madden T. Intrauterine contraception: background and device types [Internet]. UpToDate; 2022. [acessado em 26 fev. 2023]. Disponível em: https://www.uptodate.com/contents/intrauterine-contraception-background-and-device-types

DIU Tcu 360 A [Bula]. Índia: SMB Corporation of India; 2019.

United Nations. Contraceptive use by method 2019: data booklet. United Nations; 2019. https://doi.org/10.18356/1bd58a10-en DOI: https://doi.org/10.18356/1bd58a10-en

Nações Unidas do Brasil. Documentos temáticos: objetivos de desenvolvimento sustentável 1, 2, 3, 5, 9, 14 [Internet]. Brasília: ONUBR; 2017 [acessado em 01 out. 2023]. Disponível em: https://www.undp.org/pt/brazil/publications/documentos-tem%C3%A1ticos-ods-1-2-3-5-9-14

Kabeer N. Resources, agency, achievements: reflections on the measurement of women’s empowerment. Dev Change 2002;30(3):435-64. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-7660.00125 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-7660.00125

Berth J. Empoderamento. São Paulo: Pólen Editorial; 2019.

Organización Panamericana de la Salud. Facultad de Salud Pública Bloomberg de Johns Hopkins/Centro para Programas de Comunicación. Planificación familiar: un manual mundial para proveedores [Internet]. Baltimore: CCP y OPS; 2019. [acessado em 01 out. 2023]. Disponível em: https://iris.paho.org/handle/10665.2/51918

Gonzaga VAS, Borges ALV, Santos OA, Rosa PLFS, Gonçalves RFS. Barreiras organizacionais para disponibilização e inserção do dispositivo intrauterino nos serviços de atenção básica à saúde. Rev Esc Enferm USP 2017;51:e03270. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1980-220X2016046803270 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/s1980-220x2016046803270

Machado RB. Uso de dispositivos intrauterinos (DIU) em nulíparas. São Paulo: Febrasgo; 2017.

Brasil. Secretaria Municipal de Saúde. Subsecretaria de Atenção Primária, Vigilância e Promoção da Saúde. Links úteis [Internet]. Rio de Janeiro, 2019 [acessado em 26 fev. 2023]. Disponível em: https://subpav.org/

Casique I. What diference does it make? Women’s autonomy and power and use of contraception in Mexico. In: XXIV IUSSP General Population Conference. Salvador (BA); 2001. Disponível em: https://iussp.org/sites/default/files/Brazil2001/s80/S87_01_Casique.pdf

Takeshita C. Biopolitique du stérilet: Stratégies au Sud. Travail Genre et Sociétés 2015;34(2):109-27. https://doi.org/10.3917/tgs.034.0109 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/tgs.034.0109

Elliott N. The Georgia IUD project: an ethnography of birth control and biopolitics [Internet]. 2019 [acessado em 01 out. 2023]. Disponível em: https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/anthro_theses/150

Prata N, Fraser A, Huchko MJ, Gipson JD, Withers M, Lewis S, et al. Women’s empowerment and family planning: a review of the literature. J Biosoc Sci 2017;49(6):713-43. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021932016000663 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021932016000663

Ross J, Bietsch K. The open birth interval: a resource for reproductive health programs and women’s empowerment. Glob Health Sci Pract. 2019;7(3):355-70. https://doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-19-00056 DOI: https://doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-19-00056

Published

2024-10-06

How to Cite

1.
Mendonça MOL de, Faria Neto E, Correia IB, Silva RCF da. Expanded access to intra-uterine devices: impact of a work process promoting autonomy in contraception. Rev Bras Med Fam Comunidade [Internet]. 2024 Oct. 6 [cited 2024 Oct. 16];19(46):3975. Available from: https://rbmfc.org.br/rbmfc/article/view/3975

Issue

Section

Research Articles

Plaudit