Treinamento e prática de inserção de Dispositivo Intrauterino: relato de experiência de um residente em Medicina de Família e Comunidade

Diego Henrique Menezes Batista; Ricardo Souza Heizelmann

doi:10.5712/rbmfc19(46)4254

Authors

Diego Henrique Menezes Batista Universidade Federal de Santa Maria – Santa Maria (RS), Brasil. https://orcid.org/0009-0000-6456-7557
Ricardo Souza Heizelmann Universidade Federal de Santa Maria – Santa Maria (RS), Brasil. https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6723-060X

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5712/rbmfc19(46)4254

Keywords:

Family practice, Intrauterine devices, Activities, training, Reproductive health.

Abstract

Introduction: Access to family and reproductive planning is a right for everyone. The intrauterine device (IUD) is a low-cost, long-term effective contraceptive option but paradoxically still has low usage rates in primary health care (PHC) services. IUD insertion and removal are part of the competency-based curriculum of the Family Practice Residency and the Primary Health Care Services Portfolio. Experience report: As part of the curricular program of the Family Practice residency at Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, I participated in an internship at a tertiary hospital for IUD insertion training. After the training, I sought, with the family health strategy team where I currently work, to develop a protocol for access to the contraceptive method. The availability of the resource increased the service’s resolvability and, at the same time, enabled the exercise of coordinated work and health management experience. Discussion: The establishment of IUD insertion increases the service’s resolvability and strengthens the movement to value PHC. One may observe that patients had a greater role in their care, adjusting it to their sociocultural context, facilitated by the bond with professionals who take care of themselves and their families on an ongoing basis. Conclusion: Training in IUD insertion and its implementation in the service portfolio of a health unit expanded my ability to manage teamwork, in a progressive way of care, offering comprehensive health care and service resolvability. These factors reaffirm the idea that it is possible to provide excellent public health, strengthening what is stipulated in the constitution.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Starrs AM, Ezeh AC, Barker G, Basu A, Bertrand JT, Blum R, et al. Accelerate progress-sexual and reproductive health and rights for all: report of the Guttmacher-Lancet Commission. Lancet 2018;391(10140):2642-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30293-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30293-9

Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. Secretaria de Atenção à Saúde. Departamento de Atenção Básica. Saúde sexual e saúde reprodutiva. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde; 2013.

Pivesan F. Temas de direitos humanos. 9ªed. São Paulo: Saraiva; 2016.

Bearak J, Popinchalk A, Alkema L, Sedgh G. Global, regional, and sub-regional trends in unintended pregnancy and its outcomes from 1990 to 2014: estimates from a Bayesian hierarchical model. Lancet Glob Health 2018;6(4):e380-e389. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(18)30029-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(18)30029-9

Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. Pesquisa Nacional de Demografia e Saúde da Criança e da Mulher – PNDS 2006: dimensões do processo reprodutivo e da saúde da criança. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde; 2009.

Nilson TV, Amato AA, Resende CN, Primo WQSP, Nomura RMY, Costa ML, et al. Gravidez não planejada no Brasil: estudo nacional em oito hospitais universitários. Rev Saude Publica 2023;57:35. https://doi.org/10.11606/s1518-8787.2023057004449 DOI: https://doi.org/10.11606/s1518-8787.2023057004449

Morais IGF, Barreto DS, Melo Neto AJ, Soares RS, Gonçalves RD, Rêgo MEMP, Costa PSR Rev Bras Med Fam Comunidade. Rio de Janeiro, 2021 Jan-Dez; 16(43):264911 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5712/rbmfc16(43)2649

Winner B, Peipert JF, Zhao Q, Bucke C, Madden T, Allsworth JE, et al. Effectiveness of long-acting reversible contraception. Engl J Med 2012;366(21):1998-2007. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1110855 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1110855

Blumenthal PD, Voedisch A, Gemzell-Danielsson K. Strategies to prevent unintended pregnancy: increasing use of long-acting reversible contraception. Hum Reprod Update 2011;17(1):121-137. https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmq026 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmq026

Trussell J, Hassan F, Lowin J, Law A, Filonenko A. Achieving cost-neutrality with long-acting reversible contraceptive methods. Contraception 2015;91(1):49-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2014.08.011 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2014.08.011

Rivera R, Yacobson I, Grimes D. The mechanism of action of hormonal contraceptives and intrauterine contraceptive devices. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999;181:1263-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9378(99)70120-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9378(99)70120-1

Ortiz ME, Croxatto HB. Copper-T intrauterine device and levonorgestrel intrauterine system: biological bases of their mechanism of action. Contraception 2007;75:S16-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2007.01.020 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2007.01.020

Trussell J. Contraceptive failure in the United States. Contraception 2011;83(5):397-404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2011.01.021 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2011.01.021

Girum T, Wasie A. Return of fertility after discontinuation of contraception: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Contracept Reprod Med 2018;3(1):9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40834-018-0064-y DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40834-018-0064-y

American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 121: long-acting reversible contraception: implants and intrauterine devices. Obstet Gynecol 2011;118(1):184-196. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0b013e318227f05e DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0b013e318227f05e

Diedrich JT, Klein DA, Peipert JF. Long-acting reversible contraception in adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Obst Ginecol 2017;216(4):364-e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2016.12.024 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2016.12.024

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. U.S. Medical eligibility criteria for contraceptive use, 2010. MMWR Recomm Rep 2010;59(RR-4):1-86. PMID: 20559203

Shaamash AH, Sayed GH, Hussien MM, Shaaban MM. A comparative study of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system Mirena versus the Copper T380A intrauterine device during lactation: breast-feeding performance, infant growth and infant development. Contraception 2005;72(5):346-351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2005.04.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2005.04.004

Campbell SJ, Cropsey KL, Matthews CA. Intrauterine device use in a high-risk population: experience from an urban university clinic. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007; 197(2):193.e1-193.e6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2007.04.028 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2007.04.028

Steenland MW, Tepper NK, Curtis KM, Kapp N. Intrauterine contraceptive insertion postabortion: a systematic review. Contraception 2011;84:447-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2011.03.007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2011.03.007

Washington CI, Jamshidi R, Thung SF, Nayeri UA, Caughey AB, Werner EF. Timing of postpartum intrauterine device placement: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Fertil Steril 2015;103:131-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.09.032 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.09.032

Grimes DA, Lopez LM, Manion C, Schulz KF. Cochrane systematic reviews of IUD trials: lessons learned. Contraception 2007;75(6 Suppl):S55-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2006.12.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2006.12.004

OʼNeil-Callahan M, Peipert JF, Zhao Q, Madden T, Secura G. Twenty-four-month continuation of reversible contraception. Obstet Gynecol 2013;122: 1083-91. PMID: 24104781 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182a91f45

Diedrich JT, Madden T, Zhao Q, Peipert JF. Long-term utilization and continuation of intrauterine devices. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015;213(6):822.e1-822.e6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2015.08.077 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2015.08.077

Gonzaga, VAS, Borges ALV, Santos OAD, Rosa PLFS, Gonçalves RFS. Barreiras organizacionais para disponibilização e inserção do dispositivo intrauterino nos serviços de atenção básica à saúde. Rev Esc Enferm USP 2017;51:e03270-e03270. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1980-220x2016046803270

Svanemyr J, Chandra-Mouli V, Christiansen CS, Mbizvo M. Preventing child marriages: first international day of the girl child “my life, my right, end child marriage”. Reprod Health 2012; 9:31. https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-4755-9-31 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-4755-9-31

Theme-Filha M, Baldisserotto ML, Fraga ACSA, Ayers S, Gama SGN, Leal MC. Factors associated with unintended pregnancy in Brazil: cross-sectional results from the Birth in Brazil National Survey, 2011/2012. Reprod Health 2016;13(Suppl 3):118. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-016-0227-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-016-0227-8

Dados do Sistema de Informação sobre Mortalidade (DATASUS). Óbitos de mulheres em idade fértil e óbitos maternos - Brasil [Internet]. 2023 [acessado em 23 dez. 2023]. Disponível em: http://tabnet.datasus.gov.br/cgi/tabcgi.exe?sim/cnv/mat10uf.def.

Organización Mundial de la Salud (OMS), Fondo de las Naciones Unidas para la Infancia (UNICEF), Fondo de Población de las Naciones Unidas (UNFPA), Departamento de Asuntos Políticos y de Consolidación de la Paz de las Naciones Unidas (DPNU). Tendencias em la mortalidade materna de 2000 a 2017. Cálculos realizados por la OMS, el UNICEF, el UNFPA, el Grupo del Banco Mundial y la División de Población de las Naciones Unidas (DPNU) [Internet]. 2019 [acessado em 23 dez. 2023]. Disponível em: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/332475/WHO-RHR-19.2

Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. Sistema de Informações sobre Mortalidade – SIM [Internet]. 2020 [acessado em 23 dez. 2023]. Disponível em: http://vigilancia.saude.mg.gov.br/index.php/sistemas-de-informacao/mortalidade/

Jacobson L, Garbers S, Helmy H, Roobol H, Kohn JE, Kavanaugh ML. IUD services among primary care practices in New York City. Contraception 2016;93(3):257-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2015.11.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2015.11.002

Gonzaga VAS, Borges ALV, Santos OAl, Rosa PLFS, Gonçalves RFS. Barreiras organizacionais para disponibilização e inserção do dispositivo intrauterino nos serviços de Atenção Básica à Saúde. Rev Esc Enferm USP 2017;51:e03270. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1980-220x2016046803270 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/s1980-220x2016046803270

Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina de Família e Comunidade. Currículo Baseado em Competências para Medicina de Família e Comunidade [Internet]. [s.l.]: Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina de Família e Comunidade; 2015 [acessado em 23 dez. 2023]. Disponível em: http://www.sbmfc.org.br/wp-content/uploads/media/Curriculo%20Baseado%20em%20Competencias(1).pdf

Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. Secretaria de Atenção Primária à Saúde. Departamento de Saúde da Família. Carteira de Serviços da Atenção Primária à Saúde (CaSAPS): versão profissionais de saúde e gestores [Internet]. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde; 2020 [acessado em 23 dez. 2023]. Disponível em: https://bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/publicacoes/carteira_servicos_atencao_primaria_saude_profissionais_saude_gestores_completa.pdf